xmech2k Report post Posted October 22, 2009 I've searched to no avail, so I'll ask here: Why would the 2010 Fusion S come with aluminum allow wheels, and the SE, presumably a 'higher' model, come with steel rims with hubcaps? :banghead: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
akirby Report post Posted October 22, 2009 I've searched to no avail, so I'll ask here: Why would the 2010 Fusion S come with aluminum allow wheels, and the SE, presumably a 'higher' model, come with steel rims with hubcaps? :banghead: I don't know for sure, but I have a suspicion. Go check the fuel economy difference between the S and the SE. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xmech2k Report post Posted October 22, 2009 I'm aware of the better MPG of the S, but in today's mega-corporate world, you'd think the supposedly cheaper rims would go on the cheaper car. Guess maybe they thought a little past that to the MPG marketing, if this is the only reason why. I would still think it's more the tire style/size that would have a bigger impact on MPG than the rim. Would the rim weight have a bigger impact on MPG? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Waldo Report post Posted October 22, 2009 It all comes down to tooling dollars. When you make alloy wheels, you make a bunch of small, cheap tools the each put out a low volume of wheels. When you make a stamped steel wheel, you make one expensive tool that pumps out a whole lot of wheels. So it's actually cheaper for Ford to make a couple of alloy tools for the low volume of S models, even though the cost of each wheel is higher. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
akirby Report post Posted October 23, 2009 Guess maybe they thought a little past that to the MPG marketing Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner...... No other reason really. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tralmix Report post Posted October 23, 2009 There were some extra actions taken on the S model to reduce weight to get to the best-in-class fuel economy number. I'm sure the aluminum wheels were part of that action. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
muskie Report post Posted October 28, 2009 I bought a 2010 SE and was astonished I couldn't get an aluminum wheels as an option. I could only get alloys on SEL. I'm really bummed I had to settle for steel wheels and hubcaps! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FtLewis2002 Report post Posted October 28, 2009 It all comes down to tooling dollars. When you make alloy wheels, you make a bunch of small, cheap tools the each put out a low volume of wheels. When you make a stamped steel wheel, you make one expensive tool that pumps out a whole lot of wheels. So it's actually cheaper for Ford to make a couple of alloy tools for the low volume of S models, even though the cost of each wheel is higher. <Pop, Hisssssss> (That's the air coming out of your balloon) If that's the case, then why does the SEL come with alloy wheels? I costs more than both of them. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Waldo Report post Posted October 29, 2009 <Pop, Hisssssss> (That's the air coming out of your balloon) If that's the case, then why does the SEL come with alloy wheels? I costs more than both of them. Sure, and Ford decided to buy many alloy wheel tools AND pay the higher piece price of the wheels. You missed the point, which is that LOW VOLUME wheels can be cheaper in alloy than steel. The S is LOW VOLUME. The SE and SEL are not. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Grey Report post Posted October 29, 2009 It's all about the weight and resulting fuel economy_ One of the articles said--- "The team eliminated 125 pounds versus the 2009 Fusion. The size of the radiator, for example, was able to be reduced by one-third with no degradation in performance. Also, 16-inch aluminum wheels helped reduce weight and aid aerodynamics while still delivering top performance." :shift: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xmech2k Report post Posted October 29, 2009 Ouch! Glad I didn't go with an S. I wonder how that radiator would handle the mountains between San Diego & Phoenix in the summer? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FtLewis2002 Report post Posted October 29, 2009 It's all about the weight and resulting fuel economy_ One of the articles said--- "The team eliminated 125 pounds versus the 2009 Fusion. The size of the radiator, for example, was able to be reduced by one-third with no degradation in performance. Also, 16-inch aluminum wheels helped reduce weight and aid aerodynamics while still delivering top performance." :shift: Curb weight on the 2010 SEL is 3548, while the 09 SEL is 3446...the 2010 is 102lbs heavier than the 09...Don't know about the "S" model... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FtLewis2002 Report post Posted October 29, 2009 Sure, and Ford decided to buy many alloy wheel tools AND pay the higher piece price of the wheels. You missed the point, which is that LOW VOLUME wheels can be cheaper in alloy than steel. The S is LOW VOLUME. The SE and SEL are not. Why not just use the cheaper steel wheels on the S model in that case? You must have been the CFO for General Motors...(kidding) Seriously though, why not use the cheaper steel wheels on the "S" since they are already being used on the "SE"? That would be cheaper than making a tooling set for the low volume "S" model. Personally, I think you're wrong, but will argue your point regardless. Ford is going to save money anywhere they can. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Waldo Report post Posted October 30, 2009 Why not just use the cheaper steel wheels on the S model in that case? You must have been the CFO for General Motors...(kidding) Seriously though, why not use the cheaper steel wheels on the "S" since they are already being used on the "SE"? That would be cheaper than making a tooling set for the low volume "S" model. Personally, I think you're wrong, but will argue your point regardless. Ford is going to save money anywhere they can. It's all about CAFE/EPA rules. The S is tested independantly of the SE with the goal of getting a lower advertisable fuel economy label. The 16in tire is significantly lower in rolling resistance than the 17in tire (~20%), so that makes a big difference. That's why the S has 16in wheels and why the SE gets much worse fuel economy. So the real question is why didn't Ford use the old 16in steel wheel from the 06-09 Fusion? Two reasons I can think of:1. They didn't want to use the same wheel cover and tooling a new plastic wheel cover is also more expensive then tooling an alloy wheel.2. CAFE/EPA uses "weight classes" to test vehicles, not the actual weight. The classes go in 250lb increments, so if your car is just 1 pound over the limit, it bumps you to the next class, which means you actually have to test with 250lbs more weight. So even though the additional 3-4lbs of a steel wheel won't affect the real world fuel economy that much, if the rest of the car is right at the limit of the EPA class, then that couple pounds can actually save 250lbs of test weight, which does make a big difference in the EPA label. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
who Report post Posted October 30, 2009 I think Fords use of alloy rims on the S was a marketing decision. I am a S owner. The S model is stripped down pretty severely especially with its coffee grinder transmission. When I compared the Fusion S to the other stripped models of the , accord, camry, corolla the Fusion sold me on the alloy rims. Call me vain but my peers on the road are looking at the outside of the car and the fusion with alloy rims looks more expensive than it is. Ford wins this battle over the competitors in the entry model low price cars for looks. Now lets look at another buyer who wants a Ford not an import car and has a little more money to spend. The S model is out of the question, but he is on the fence on the SE model vs the SEL. The SE is in his price range BUT those wheels on the SE vs the SEL....He don't like them, No, No... Shazamm!! next thing you know you move the buyer up to the next model and Ford wins again. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KTPworker Report post Posted October 31, 2009 This kind of goes with this topic...I just put a larger wheel on my 2010 SE and I'm getting close to 1 MPG worse than with my factory wheels. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Grey Report post Posted October 31, 2009 This kind of goes with this topic...I just put a larger wheel on my 2010 SE and I'm getting close to 1 MPG worse than with my factory wheels. If you put on a plus size tire, then you need to adjust for your miles actually covered in order to acurately compute your MPG. The odometer will read lower than the actual miles covered. Other factors can also affect MPG such as change in temperature, blend of gas additives and unsprung weight - if you put on a heavier or lighter tire/wheel combination. I'm getting 1 MPG worse just because it is getting cooler. :shift: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
akirby Report post Posted November 1, 2009 If you put on a plus size tire, then you need to adjust for your miles actually covered in order to acurately compute your MPG. The odometer will read lower than the actual miles covered. True Plus 1 (or 2 or 3) sizing normally means the outside tire diameter is the same (with a larger wheel) so that wouldn't affect mileage. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Grey Report post Posted November 2, 2009 True Plus 1 (or 2 or 3) sizing normally means the outside tire diameter is the same (with a larger wheel) so that wouldn't affect mileage. Good catch, I should have said larger diameter tire will afffect the odometer reading (and speedometer accuracy.) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DOUG Report post Posted November 15, 2009 I'm liking the wheels on my S. Just bought the car yesterday and when I questioned the dealer about the different wheels, they couldn't give me an answer. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drfdcc Report post Posted November 27, 2009 I hated the ulgy hubcaps on my 2010 SE so I replaced them with the hubcaps from the Mercury Milan, looks considerably better... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
deo1929 Report post Posted December 11, 2009 The Fusion S has 65 series radials where the SE and SEL have 50 series radials. So there's is approximately 15% more tire contact to the road with the SE/SEL. The outside diameters of the two tire/wheel combos are close. A narrower tire and a harder compound (Goodyear MAX mileage rubber) will get more MPG's, but you will feel the difference in handling between the S and the SE/SEL. If you decide to swap rims/wheels, you'll also have to deal with the tire pressure monitoring system, which could get pricy. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bbf2530 Report post Posted December 11, 2009 (edited) The Fusion S has 65 series radials where the SE and SEL have 50 series radials. So there's is approximately 15% more tire contact to the road with the SE/SEL. The outside diameters of the two tire/wheel combos are close. A narrower tire and a harder compound (Goodyear MAX mileage rubber) will get more MPG's, but you will feel the difference in handling between the S and the SE/SEL. If you decide to swap rims/wheels, you'll also have to deal with the tire pressure monitoring system, which could get pricy. Hi deo. :D Just to correct a misconception in those numbers. First, the 2010 Fusion S has 205/60-16 series tires, not 65 series. Next and more importantly, there is no difference in the tire contact patch on the Fusion due to the 60 vs. 50 ratio sidewalls, since the overall wheel/tire diameter is the same. In other words, since the overall wheel tire diameter stays approximately unchanged, the sidewall ratio makes no difference in contact patch size. To use another example: As long as the overall wheel/tire overall diameter was kept the same approximate size, you could use a 75 series sidewall ratio tire and the contact patch would not change (except as noted below). However, with the Fusion, there is a contact patch difference due to change in tread width. The S tire is a 205/60-16 (205mm wide). The SE is a 225/50-17 (225mm wide). So the SE tire is 20mm wider, thus giving a wider contact patch (but the same approximate length contact patch, front to back). Bottom line, if my math is correct, the 225/50-17 wheel tire combo has a 9-10% larger contact patch. Hope this information helps. Good luck. :beerchug: Edited December 11, 2009 by bbf2530 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
