lolder Report post Posted December 11, 2014 I have read that our FFH is only good for up two miles in EV mode, so a second battery charged over night would make that 2 mile stretch seem short?You are talking about a plug in hybrid. Making a plug in out of a non-plug-in makes no economic sense particularly when the manufacturer makes one. The HVB is an expensive, fragile, dangerous device that would be very difficult to add to. The software is different and the onboard HVB charging from AC is a whole additional system. This is not remotely like paralleling two 12 vdc batteries. There are two conflicting operations involved here. Contrary to popular belief, it is NOT desirable to maximize EV use in a hybrid because the EV cycle of generating-charging-discharging-motoring has more loss in many cases than driving the car through the gears to the wheels, particularly at higher speeds. All the hybrids have about a 1.5 Kwh HVB which is sized to provide a significant recovery of braking energy and provide cyclic use of EV at lower speeds all within a very narrow range of HVB charge which provides long battery life. Larger HVBs are not an advantage as it adds only cost, weight and reduced luggage capacity. Plug in hybrids are an engineers nightmare. They try to find the middle ground between pure plug-in electrics range anxiety and hybrids. They don't do that very well and their price premium has been more unrecoverable than hybrids. If you drove 20 miles a day with a plug in hybrid, you would only save $0.75 a day over the hybrid. For a year of commuting that would be less than $200. That's with electricity at $0.12/kwh and gas at $3.00/gal and doesn't include amortizing a home charging station. If you got your electricity free it would only save $400. 3 Waldo, corncobs and Hybrider reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites