Jump to content
compnurd

Rear brake pads thickness

Recommended Posts

I "think" they're both 11mm. premature wear on the rear pads has been an occasional complaint since the 2010 models. At first it was thought to be a manufacturing fault or defect. I'm of the opinion now that it is usually aggressive braking habits. Many FFH's have gone over 100kmiles with little wear. It's hard to judge an individuals braking habits from their verbal descriptions. Very high brake scores might yield long life. Significant braking can be done by regen in the 2013+ models. Two and a half times more regen braking energy can be absorbed by the 2013+ vs. the 2010-12 models. With the higher regen braking available, the rear mechanical brakes may be applied more to effect stable braking behavior. Very few people drove conventional cars in the way that hybrids must be driven to eliminate almost all pad wear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With the higher regen braking available, the rear mechanical brakes may be applied more to effect stable braking behavior.

 

The pads on my 2010 FFH lasted a long long time and I replaced them at 140k just because I had the news ones sitting in a box on the shelf in the garage for over a year. There was about half of the pads left, as I've posted that pic in a couple different threads on the forum already.

 

However on my 2006 Escape Hybrid, a few years ago I went for an inspection and they called back to say I needed rear brakes replaced (had about 60k miles at that time) and I thought sure they were BS-ing me just to get me to pay for a brake job, so I said put the wheels back on and put the failure sticker on the windshield, I will check it out myself. Got home and pulled a rear wheel and sure enough the rear brakes were gone at 60k, while the fronts were fine.

 

Now to the present with the 2013 Energi where I've had lifetime brake score of 98% over 56k miles, and I got the tires rotated a couple weeks ago and was told "we looked at the brakes and the fronts look new, but the rear ones are going to need replacing before too long" -- that was a surprise, and I plan to pull the rear wheels this weekend or next to get a look for myself. So it's a sharp contrast between the 2010 FFH which had virtually no wear and the 2013 which potentially has much more wear, all with the same driver who drives very smoothly and conservatively with good brake scores. So ya never know...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It appears that the car engages the rear pads first since the regen braking force comes from the front. There is a Ford patent describing this behavior. This would explain why rear brake pads get used up first.

That is an interesting side effect of a hybrid with regen braking. On a conventional car, where the front brakes perform ~70% of the braking, the front brake pads generally wear faster than the rears.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just found this forum...very nice. Have a 2015 FFH SE with 98k mi and dealer (yup the dealer) miced em at 8MM all around... The advisor said "Yeah, the FFH, yeah, not sure I've ever replaced pads on one... ever". Incredible.

This model has the braking coach...zowie it is good and surely helped.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...