acdii Report post Posted January 26, 2013 I dont know if this link will work for others, http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=33083&id=26405 but did a comparison between the 2013 and 2010 Fusion Hybrids. The 2010 is rated at 39 combined, and the overall average is 38.8, which I can concur on since that is what mine can get(when we try). But the 2013 is abysmal, only 39.8, 6.2 MPG below its combined rating. Cmax is even lower. Next I compared the Toyota Camry and Prius to the 2010 Fusion. At least you get what you pay for with Toyota. 2010 Camry is rated at 34, and is averaging 37, but to be fair, it was based on only 5 vehicles, so added the 2012 Camry, with 10 vehicles, and it is 41 combined, and showing 40.3. Prius though, 174 vehicles combined is 50, and average is 49.3. I compared 2010,11 and 12 FFH and they all are right on the money average>combined. So what the heck is up with the Fusion/Cmax? Pretty embarrassing for Ford, especially if the warm weather doesn't show improvements. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
acdii Report post Posted January 26, 2013 Just for the heck of it, my 2010 on Fueleconomy.gov from last may after the MAP was replaced, Delete Edit Time Period Driving Conditions MPG Data Check Notes City Highway 06/23/2012 to 11/23/2012 20% 80% 39.7 Normal driving to the speed limit Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites