Jump to content
Errol Ikalina

Which one is right?

Recommended Posts

No, really, that 100+ mpg doesn't mean anything. All it means is that the car was running in EV mode almost all the time and the battery charge went from full to almost empty. So the big mpg on that short trip gets balanced by lower mpg later caused by the depleted battery from that 100 mpg short trip.

I think mwr is making sense here. The only thing I would add is that you drove on mostly EV during that on/off cycle because the HVB SOC was high and the SOC was high because you consumed gasoline in the previous on/off cycle to achieve that high SOC. It was your previous on/off cycle that subsidized the 100+ MPG on/off cycle. And as mwr pointed out you are going to be penalized on the next on/off cycle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Adding an Ultra Gauge will clear things up.

 

The Ultra Gauge I mentioned earlier is a plug-in device that does a much better job tracking of these and other data. Engineers (read "geeks") love data!

A little off subject, but can you post what you can read with the Ultragauge on the hybrid please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact is that if you can learn where and when to use other-than-gasoline to charge the mains back up, you are that much farther ahead.

Your statement would be true if there was a way to charge a hybrid's HVB with something other than gasoline. In a hybrid that is not possible. In a PHEV or a BEV where you are charging the HVB with grid electricty your statement is true.

 

In a hybrid, such as the FFH, anytime you capture energy to recharge the HVB (by regenerative braking or when going down hill) you are not charging the battery with something other than gasoline. You are simply recovering some of the energy previously expended by burning gasoline. To get top the top of that hill you burned gasoline and when you go back down the hill you recapture some of that energy from the previously burned gasoline. This is a very good thing and is what makes a hybrid more efficent than a conventiona ICE car. Likewise, with regenerative braking you are simply recapturing some of the energy from the previously burned gasoline to achieve the velocity that you are now reducing with your regenerative braking.

 

All of the energy (100% of it) that goes into charging your HVB comes from gasoline with a hybrid.

Edited by Texasota

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But you CAN get better at using the physics of moving mass to help your charging sydtem.

That is true and explains why one driver may achieve 50 MPG with a FFH and another driver may only achieve 40 MPG given the same car and driving conditions. But the same also applies (to a lesser degree) for a conventional ICE car. The way your drive them makes a huge difference.

 

But back to what mwr was originally saying is true. That 100 MPG is very misleading because it was heavily subsidized by energy derived from burning gasoline in the past when you climbed the hill and/or acheived a high SOC on the HVB. If you were to set your trip display to measure your mileage over 10-20 cycles of your commute you will likely have an average MPG only in the 40-50 range. But, 40-50 is nothing to sneeze at! The FFH is very impressive.

Edited by Texasota

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...